Discussion:
Robert, do you still think the Shearjashub prophecy was made in 730 BCE?
(too old to reply)
Ted
2023-01-11 00:57:03 UTC
Permalink
?
Dr. Who
2023-01-11 01:08:12 UTC
Permalink
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Ted
2023-01-11 01:51:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dr. Who
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy that he
wasn't going to give until years later.

But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only one
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree with me
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens to be
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth preceded
Immanuel's.
Dr. Who
2023-01-11 02:32:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy that he
wasn't going to give until years later.
But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only one
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree with me
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens to be
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth preceded
Immanuel's.
Where is the return of the remnant in Chapter Six?

The word "return" is used one time there and it is this,...

“But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be eaten:
as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when they cast
their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.” (Isa 6:13,
KJV)

And there is no usage of the word Remnant in chapter six.

But I will be happy to entertain your thoughts on it.
Ted
2023-01-11 05:56:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dr. Who
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy that he
wasn't going to give until years later.
But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only one
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree with me
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens to be
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth
preceded
Post by Dr. Who
Post by Ted
Immanuel's.
Where is the return of the remnant in Chapter Six?
The word "return" is used one time there and it is this,...
as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when they cast
their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.” (Isa 6:13,
KJV)
And there is no usage of the word
Remnant in chapter six.
But I will be happy to entertain your
thoughts on it.
Thanks Robert. Shearjashub means "a remnant will escape". But there
isn't anything for either of us to gain from this particular
argument, so I'd prefer just to drop it.
Dr. Who
2023-01-11 06:17:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy that he
wasn't going to give until years later.
But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only one
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree
with me
Post by Dr. Who
Post by Ted
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens to be
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth
preceded
Post by Dr. Who
Post by Ted
Immanuel's.
Where is the return of the remnant in Chapter Six?
The word "return" is used one time there and it is this,...
“But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be
as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when
they cast
Post by Dr. Who
their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.”
(Isa 6:13,
Post by Dr. Who
KJV)
And there is no usage of the word
Remnant in chapter six.
But I will be happy to entertain your
thoughts on it.
Thanks Robert. Shearjashub means "a remnant will escape". But there
isn't anything for either of us to gain from this particular
argument, so I'd prefer just to drop it.
Ok.
Ted
2023-01-12 01:06:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:08:12 -0800, Dr.
Post by Dr. Who
(in
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy that he
wasn't going to give until years later.
But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only one
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree
with me
Post by Dr. Who
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens to be
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth
preceded
Post by Dr. Who
Immanuel's.
Where is the return of the remnant in Chapter Six?
The word "return" is used one time there and it is this,...
“But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall be
as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when
they cast
Post by Dr. Who
their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.”
(Isa 6:13,
Post by Dr. Who
KJV)
And there is no usage of the word
Remnant in chapter six.
But I will be happy to entertain your
thoughts on it.
Thanks Robert. Shearjashub means "a remnant will escape". But there
isn't anything for either of us to gain from this particular
argument, so I'd prefer just to drop it.
Ok.
Thanks man.
Dr. Who
2023-01-12 03:07:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ted
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:08:12 -0800, Dr.
Post by Dr. Who
(in
?
Yes, as given in chapter 10
Then he would have had to name Shearjashub for a prophecy
that he
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
wasn't going to give until years later.
But I looked it up online just now, and you're not the only
one
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
claiming Isaiah 10 was the prophecy. It seems to be a popular
opinion. Others, though, such as Ellicott's commentary, agree
with me
Post by Dr. Who
that it was the prophecy in chapter 6, not 10, which happens
to be
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
far more plausible, given that we know Shearjashub's birth
preceded
Post by Dr. Who
Immanuel's.
Where is the return of the remnant in Chapter Six?
The word "return" is used one time there and it is this,...
“But yet in it shall be a tenth, and it shall return, and shall
be
Post by Ted
Post by Dr. Who
as a teil tree, and as an oak, whose substance is in them, when
they cast
Post by Dr. Who
their leaves: so the holy seed shall be the substance thereof.”
(Isa 6:13,
Post by Dr. Who
KJV)
And there is no usage of the word
Remnant in chapter six.
But I will be happy to entertain your
thoughts on it.
Thanks Robert. Shearjashub means "a remnant will escape". But
there
Post by Ted
isn't anything for either of us to gain from this particular
argument, so I'd prefer just to drop it.
Ok.
Thanks man.
No problem. Sometimes it is too easy to just flog a horse to death which
benefits no one. I thought it was a wise move.

Loading...