My respect for the Bible vs the christers' utter lack of it

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature, unparalleled,
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the time
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna learn the
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their god,
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings and openly
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of these,
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck what
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion. So
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

I cant say I disagree with you I have seen so-called Christians take
individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their heretical
beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse that said
that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the rest of the
verse said that the man is the head of the family and should lead the
family the way Christ leads the church.

I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people publish
their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to get
the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the infallible
word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find significant
issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled. There
is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the apostilles
wrote the DouayRheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic Old
Testament from the seventh century.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-25 21:29:37 UTC

Post by i***@biteme.com

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by i***@biteme.com

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the time
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna learn the
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their god,
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings and openly
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by i***@biteme.com

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck what
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion. So
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

publish

Post by i***@biteme.com
their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to get
the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the

infallible

Post by i***@biteme.com
word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find significant
issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled. There
is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the apostilles
wrote the DouayRheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic Old
Testament from the seventh century.

Very good and I agree. Also quite interesting, thank you for sharing
it.

No one

2023-02-25 21:44:20 UTC

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called Christians take
individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their heretical
beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse that said
that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the rest of the
verse said that the man is the head of the family and should lead the
family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people publish
their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to get
the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the infallible
word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find significant
issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled. There
is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the apostilles
wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic Old
Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the infallible work of God.

There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that cannot be
rectified.

That is a common misconception.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-25 23:54:36 UTC

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of these,
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck what
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled. There
is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic Old
Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the infallible work of God.
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that cannot be
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam and Eve
myth.

No one

2023-02-26 00:19:06 UTC

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna learn the
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings and

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their heretical
beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse that

said

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and should lead

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic

Old

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam and Eve
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think there is
conflict.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 00:33:34 UTC

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings and

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse that

said

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and should lead

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the

Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam and Eve
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think there is
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

No one

2023-02-26 01:42:22 UTC

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each

Post by Jack Sovalot
these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse

that

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the

rest

Post by Jack Sovalot
of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and should

lead

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses the

Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam and

Eve

Post by Jack Sovalot
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 05:33:20 UTC

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

Post by Jack Sovalot
openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each

Post by Jack Sovalot
these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse

that

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the

rest

Post by Jack Sovalot
of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and should

lead

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

Post by Jack Sovalot
There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses the

Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

Post by Jack Sovalot
work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam and

Eve

Post by Jack Sovalot
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each other but
that's beside the point.

No one

2023-02-26 07:43:29 UTC

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and

had

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

Post by Jack Sovalot
openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A

few

Post by Jack Sovalot
examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In

each

Post by Jack Sovalot
these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a

flying

Post by Jack Sovalot
fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts

5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a

verse

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the

rest

Post by Jack Sovalot
of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and

should

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these

people

Post by Jack Sovalot
publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the

bible

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

Post by Jack Sovalot
There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses the

Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

Post by Jack Sovalot
work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think

there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each other but
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you accuse others
of doing.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 17:22:26 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

Post by Jack Sovalot
unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and

had

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

Post by Jack Sovalot
openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A

few

Post by Jack Sovalot
examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In

each

Post by Jack Sovalot
these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a

flying

Post by Jack Sovalot
fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts

5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a

verse

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the

rest

Post by Jack Sovalot
of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and

should

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these

people

Post by Jack Sovalot
publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the

bible

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

Post by Jack Sovalot
There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses the

Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

Post by Jack Sovalot
work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis that

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the Adam

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think

there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each other but
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you

accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is it
truth in general that you object to?

No one

2023-02-26 19:19:21 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

Post by Jack Sovalot
unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even

wanna

Post by Jack Sovalot
learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

Post by Jack Sovalot
god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

Post by Jack Sovalot
openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches.

Post by Jack Sovalot
examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16.

Post by Jack Sovalot
these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a

flying

Post by Jack Sovalot
fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in

Acts

Post by Jack Sovalot
5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a

verse

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting

that the

Post by Jack Sovalot
rest

Post by Jack Sovalot
of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and

should

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see

these

Post by Jack Sovalot
people

Post by Jack Sovalot
publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God,

not

Post by Jack Sovalot
infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can

find

Post by Jack Sovalot
significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

Post by Jack Sovalot
There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because

this

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
Masoretic

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

Post by Jack Sovalot
work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of Genesis

that

Post by Jack Sovalot
cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the

Adam

Post by Jack Sovalot
myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think

there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each other

but

Post by Jack Sovalot
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you

accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is it
truth in general that you object to?

You do not know the truth.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 19:55:17 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:44:20 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were

intelligent

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even

wanna

Post by Jack Sovalot
learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it

matches.

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah

7:14-16.

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a

flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to

their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in

Acts

Post by Jack Sovalot
5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen so-called

Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a

verse

said

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting

that the

Post by Jack Sovalot
rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family and

should

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see

these

Post by Jack Sovalot
people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section of

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of God,

not

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can

find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that

the

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny because

this

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and uses

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
Masoretic

Old

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of

Genesis

Post by Jack Sovalot
cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the

Adam

myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many think

there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just above.

Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each other

but

Post by Jack Sovalot
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you

accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is it
truth in general that you object to?

You do not know the truth.

LOL. Because I caught you in a lie? Gawd you people are so dishonest.
:-)

John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

No one

2023-02-26 21:10:34 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:44:20 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were

intelligent

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even

wanna

Post by Jack Sovalot
learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the

words

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their churches'

teachings

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it

matches.

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah

7:14-16.

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't

give a

Post by Jack Sovalot
flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in

Acts

Post by Jack Sovalot
5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen

so-called

Post by Jack Sovalot
Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support

their

Post by Jack Sovalot
heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part

of a

Post by Jack Sovalot
verse

said

that women should be quiet, completely forgetting

that the

Post by Jack Sovalot
rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
should

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see

these

Post by Jack Sovalot
people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire section

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of

God,

Post by Jack Sovalot
not

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can

find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of Genesis

where

Post by Jack Sovalot
story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming

that

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny

because

Post by Jack Sovalot
this

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and

uses

Post by Jack Sovalot
Masoretic

Old

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of

Genesis

Post by Jack Sovalot
cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the

Adam

myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many

think

Post by Jack Sovalot
there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just

above.

Post by Jack Sovalot
Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each

other

Post by Jack Sovalot
but

Post by Jack Sovalot
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you

accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is it
truth in general that you object to?

You do not know the truth.

LOL. Because I caught you in a lie? Gawd you people are so dishonest.

Post by No one
-)

You didn't catch me in one.

God is truth. Due 32:4

You make things up as you go.

Post by Jack Sovalot
John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

You have shown why you will have no excuse on that last day.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 21:38:26 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 16:19:06 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:44:20 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were

intelligent

the

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even

wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the

words

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their

churches'

Post by Jack Sovalot
teachings

and

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it

matches.

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah

7:14-16.

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't

give a

Post by Jack Sovalot
flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's

contrary

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the

apostles in

Post by Jack Sovalot
Acts

Post by Jack Sovalot
5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen

so-called

Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support

their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part

of a

Post by Jack Sovalot
verse

that

said

that women should be quiet, completely

forgetting

Post by Jack Sovalot
that the

rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the family

and

Post by Jack Sovalot
should

lead

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see

these

Post by Jack Sovalot
people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire

section

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of

God,

Post by Jack Sovalot
not

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can

find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of

Genesis

Post by Jack Sovalot
where

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can not be

reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet

claiming

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny

because

Post by Jack Sovalot
this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and

uses

Masoretic

Old

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is not the

infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of

Genesis

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement for the

Adam

Eve

myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would many

think

Post by Jack Sovalot
there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just

above.

Post by Jack Sovalot
Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth, not to
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each

other

Post by Jack Sovalot
but

Post by Jack Sovalot
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that you

accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is it
truth in general that you object to?

You do not know the truth.

LOL. Because I caught you in a lie? Gawd you people are so

dishonest.

Post by Jack Sovalot
-)

You didn't catch me in one.

I certainly did. When you couldn't answer my question, it proved you
were lying when you accused me of showing "utter lack of respect for
the book".

Post by No one
God is truth. Due 32:4

LOL. Deu, you illiterate bastard, not Due.

Post by No one
You make things up as you go.

Another lie? If not, then tell us what I made up.

Post by Jack Sovalot
John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

You have shown why you will have no excuse on that last day.

Did you read the verses I referenced? It seems your god doesn't care
much for you liars. What will your excuse be on your mythical last
day?

Here they are again:

John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

No one

2023-02-26 23:21:12 UTC

Post by No one
(in

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 16:19:06 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 13:44:20 -0800, No

Post by No one
(in

On Sat, 25 Feb 2023 14:25:14 -0500, Jack

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient

literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were

intelligent

the

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd

even

Post by Jack Sovalot
wanna

learn the

Post by Jack Sovalot
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's

the

Post by Jack Sovalot
words

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

god,

Post by Jack Sovalot
assign a much higher priority to their

churches'

Post by Jack Sovalot
teachings

and

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it

matches.

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah

7:14-16.

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers

don't

Post by Jack Sovalot
give a

Post by Jack Sovalot
flying

fuck what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's

contrary

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

religion. So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the

apostles in

Post by Jack Sovalot
Acts

Post by Jack Sovalot
5:29.)

I can’t say I disagree with you… I have seen

so-called

Christians

take

individual verses WWAAYY out of context to

support

Post by Jack Sovalot
their

heretical

beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting

part

Post by Jack Sovalot
of a

Post by Jack Sovalot
verse

that

said

that women should be quiet, completely

forgetting

Post by Jack Sovalot
that the

rest

of the

verse said that the man is the head of the

family

Post by Jack Sovalot
should

lead

the

family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I

see

Post by Jack Sovalot
these

Post by Jack Sovalot
people

publish

their quotes I take a look at the entire

section

Post by Jack Sovalot
bible

get

the context. The bible is the inspired work of

God,

Post by Jack Sovalot
not

infallible

word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16.

I can

Post by Jack Sovalot
find

significant

issues within the first two chapters of

Genesis

Post by Jack Sovalot
where

story of

creation is significantly changed so it can

not be

Post by Jack Sovalot
reconciled.

There

is even some knucklehead in the usenet

claiming

apostilles

wrote the Douay–Rheims bible. This is funny

because

Post by Jack Sovalot
this

bible was

first published in the seventeenth century and

uses

Masoretic

Old

Testament from the seventh century.

The verse you quoted does not say that is is

not the

Post by Jack Sovalot
infallible

work of God.

Post by No one
There is nothing in the first two chapters of

Genesis

cannot

Post by No one
rectified.
That is a common misconception.

The first chapter was written as a replacement

for the

Post by Jack Sovalot
Adam

Eve

myth.

Don't be ridiculous, if that were true why would

many

Post by Jack Sovalot
think

Post by Jack Sovalot
there

Post by No one
conflict.

What conflict are you referring to?

I didn't say there were any. Read my previous reply just

above.

Post by Jack Sovalot
Genesis 1 was written to replace the Adam and Eve myth,

not to

Post by Jack Sovalot
supplement it. There are places where they contradict each

other

Post by Jack Sovalot
but

Post by Jack Sovalot
that's beside the point.

Fine, but you show utter lack of respect for the book that

you

Post by Jack Sovalot
accuse others

Post by No one
of doing.

Oh? What have I said that you believe is disrespectful? Or is

Post by Jack Sovalot
truth in general that you object to?

You do not know the truth.

LOL. Because I caught you in a lie? Gawd you people are so

dishonest.

Post by Jack Sovalot
-)

You didn't catch me in one.

I certainly did. When you couldn't answer my question, it proved you
were lying when you accused me of showing "utter lack of respect for
the book".

Post by No one
God is truth. Due 32:4

LOL. Deu, you illiterate bastard, not Due.

Post by No one
You make things up as you go.

Another lie? If not, then tell us what I made up.

Post by Jack Sovalot
John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

You have shown why you will have no excuse on that last day.

Did you read the verses I referenced? It seems your god doesn't care
much for you liars. What will your excuse be on your mythical last
day?
John 8:44
Revelation 21:8

Yes, I read them, and for those reasons I stated that you will have no excuse
on that last day. Why, because you had the truth in front of you all along,
and he knows that.

As for me, I am not part of that picture in any respect. I have already been
forgiven and my sins removed from me as far as the east is from the west. I
will also be leaving this earth the day Jesus comes to the earth, in the
clouds for his own people. So I will not be facing that judgment day.

If you knew the truth you would have known that.

I will leave you to troll others from this point on. Be wise.

Skeeter

2023-02-25 22:29:19 UTC

I can?t say I disagree with you? I have seen so-called Christians take
individual verses WWAAYY out of context to support their heretical
beliefs. The funniest was a redneck quoting part of a verse that said
that women should be quiet, completely forgetting that the rest of the
verse said that the man is the head of the family and should lead the
family the way Christ leads the church.
I am an Orthodox Christian myself, and when I see these people publish
their quotes I take a look at the entire section of the bible to get
the context. The bible is the inspired work of God, not the infallible
word; the bible states this in 2 Timothy 16. I can find significant
issues within the first two chapters of Genesis where the story of
creation is significantly changed so it can not be reconciled. There
is even some knucklehead in the usenet claiming that the apostilles
wrote the Douay?Rheims bible. This is funny because this bible was
first published in the seventeenth century and uses the Masoretic Old
Testament from the seventh century.

So just like what atheist do when trying to use Scripture.

P+Barker

2023-02-26 08:26:22 UTC

Examples please.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 17:00:25 UTC

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

these,

Examples please.

Above are a couple you'll appreciate.

In Matthew 16:18, what Jesus means is obvious.

"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it."

But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.

Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."

The JWs lie about that one.

In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

P+Barker

2023-02-26 20:29:12 UTC

On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

Post by Jack Sovalot
(unfortunately neither being the case), I'd even wanna learn the
ancient languages.
Christers, otoh, although they claim it's the words of their god,
assign a much higher priority to their churches' teachings and

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion.

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

Examples please.

Above are a couple you'll appreciate.
In Matthew 16:18, what Jesus means is obvious.
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it."
But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.
Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
The JWs lie about that one.
In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

OK.
I also get tired of pretend prophets telling me what to believe
because God has explained it to them alone.

Jack Sovalot

2023-02-26 20:32:19 UTC

Post by P+Barker
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few

examples

Post by Jack Sovalot
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their

religion.

Post by Jack Sovalot
So

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

Examples please.

against

Post by Jack Sovalot
it."
But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.
Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
The JWs lie about that one.
In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

OK.
I also get tired of pretend prophets telling me what to believe
because God has explained it to them alone.

Good point. There are too many of those.

Skeeter

2023-02-26 21:21:22 UTC

Post by P+Barker
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion.

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

Examples please.

Above are a couple you'll appreciate.
In Matthew 16:18, what Jesus means is obvious.
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it."
But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.
Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
The JWs lie about that one.
In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

OK.
I also get tired of pretend prophets telling me what to believe
because God has explained it to them alone.

You would like for there to be a God but only as long as he does things
your way.

P+Barker

2023-02-27 23:32:39 UTC

Post by Skeeter

Post by P+Barker
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion.

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

Examples please.

Above are a couple you'll appreciate.
In Matthew 16:18, what Jesus means is obvious.
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it."
But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.
Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
The JWs lie about that one.
In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

OK.
I also get tired of pretend prophets telling me what to believe
because God has explained it to them alone.

You would like for there to be a God but only as long as he does things
your way.

Speak for yourself.
I personally believe that after God started the ball rolling, He can
sit back and watch. He is not invilved in day to day activities,
which houses the tornados to hit, or the number of hairs on your head.
God gave us what we have, then watches what we decide to do with it.
It is a test. And each of us knows what is right and wrong. How are
you using the talents you have?

Skeeter

2023-02-28 00:35:05 UTC

Post by Skeeter

Post by P+Barker
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion.

Post by Jack Sovalot
they lie. (Contrary to Peter and the apostles in Acts 5:29.)

Examples please.

Above are a couple you'll appreciate.
In Matthew 16:18, what Jesus means is obvious.
"And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against
it."
But the Protestants lie about it to make it match their religion.
Another is Luke 23:43. 43 "And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto
thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise."
The JWs lie about that one.
In both cases, their false interpretations are utterly ludicrous, but
the liars still claim they believe the Bible to be God's words.

OK.
I also get tired of pretend prophets telling me what to believe
because God has explained it to them alone.

You would like for there to be a God but only as long as he does things
your way.

I agree with you on that.

Dr. Who

2023-02-28 00:58:53 UTC

Post by Skeeter

Post by P+Barker
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023 12:00:25 -0500, Jack Sovalot

Post by Jack Sovalot
The Bible is an awesome volume of ancient literature,

unparalleled,

Post by Jack Sovalot
and well worth serious study. If I were intelligent and had the

time

openly

Post by Jack Sovalot
lie about the Bible so they can pretend it matches. A few examples
are Matthew 16:18, Luke 23:43, and Isaiah 7:14-16. In each of

these,

Post by Jack Sovalot
as in countless other verses, christers don't give a flying fuck

what

Post by Jack Sovalot
they claim their god is saying if it's contrary to their religion.